-
Sep16
Dencora House detention centre to stay for Flexible New Deal?
Categories: Dencora House, Ipswich, New Deal, YMCA Training, dwp, flexible new deal, human rights, uk government; Feedback: Be the first to comment
Keywords: Dencora House, Department for Work and Pensions, dwp corruption, human rights, Ipswich Unemployed Action, jobcentre plus, New Deal, new deal scandal, uk government, unemployment, Welfare Reform, YMCA, YMCA Training
Ipswich Unemployed Action and New Deal Scandal has confirmed that Ipswich Borough Council has granted YMCA Training full planning consent for Dencora House.
Dencora House is a detention centre located on Whitehouse Industrial Estate – isolating New Deal participants from society. Even in an industrial estate, the property has a perimeter fence, the entrance is a vast distance from the main road and towards the opposite side the place is shielded from an even busier road by trees – it is good to see trees but I can’t help thinking that this place was chosen to keep the unemployed away from the town centre where most of the towns jobs actually are: funny that …and also where all the recruitment agencies are and the Jobcentre. They think the unemployed goes around creating crime such as stealing so sticking a large group of them in an industrial estate seems a way of solving that problem.
-
Aug13
No prosecutions for New Deal Fraud
Categories: New Deal, dwp, new deal fraud, uk government; Feedback: 1 Comment
Keywords: a4e, Action 4 Employment, Department for Work and Pensions, dwp, dwp corruption, flexible new deal, fraud, maatwerk, New Deal, new deal fraud, new deal scandal, uk government, Working Links, YMCA Training
New Deal Scandal can reveal that the Department for Work and Pensions has no intention for making any prosecutions for prime contractors deliberately defrauding the system. The Department for Work and Pensions currently has no plans of stopping Flexible New Deal contracts being awarded to prime contractors who have previously defrauded the system on numerous occassions for the New Deal contracts. View the rest on Flexible New Deal Scandal
-
Jul11
Jobcentre Plus suppression continues: jobseekers have zero rights
Categories: dwp, human rights, uk government; Feedback: 2 Comments
Keywords: dwp, dwp corruption, government suppression, jcp, jobcentre plus
It is official: jobseekers have no rights. Jobcentre Plus doesn’t follow the law. There is no punishment against the Department for Work and Pensions for breaking the law or for human rights violations. Claiming benefits has become more difficult with many Benefit Delivery Centres using lie detectors which work by picking up anxiety etc. in the voice, the norm once been on hold for 20+ minutes, resulting in some people being unable to claim… and to top it off now New Deal Scandal has received numerous reports of jobseekers being removed from the Jobcentre without any legal justification and incriminated. View the rest on Flexible New Deal Scandal
-
Jun10
DWP Corruption? The Campaign Against DWP Corruption
Categories: New Deal; Feedback: Be the first to comment
Keywords: Campaigns, Corruption, Department for Work and Pensions, dwp, dwp corruption, gagging orders, Government, HRA, Human Rights Act, jcp, jobcentre, jobcentre plus, racism, uk government
The Independent Watchdog for the Department for Work & Pensions
We hope you’ll find us a useful resource in helping to recognize, combat and raise awareness of abuse of power involving the UK government’s largest department, a department dependent upon a sea of civil and judicial servants, we repeatedly find not doing their job properly.
In March 2007 the then Department for Constitutional Affairs Minister Harriet Harman MP spoke on BBC1’s Question Time of “transparency” and “adherence to law”.
It is with ongoing sadness, we find her former department failing in the latter, this campaign providing the transparency parliament craves.
On the basis of a detailed body of written evidence demonstrating wrongdoing, we seek; abolition of the Office of Social Security Commissioners (OSSC) and the Parliamentary Ombudsman (PO), as they stand.
We likewise campaign for lay involvement in social security appeals, whether by jury or panels, to combat abuse of power in these private judicial courts which we find breaking the law, contrary to their function, as Parliament requires; to uphold it.
We also want to see change in the complaints procedure, again by way of truly independent adjudication for staff misconduct and disciplinary action for all demonstrated instances of mischief or illegal activity within the DWP and its associated bodies including the Child Support Agency (CSA), now re-branded the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC).
We aim likewise to inform, how public servants, salaried by the British taxpayer, can, for their own reasons, bully and defraud the weakest members in society , while those judicial servants in place to oversee them, not only condone such, join in, cover up and whitewash their colleagues criminal behaviour, the DWP remaining a bastion of the archaic and corrupt practice of closing ranks; a mentality which invites the campaign.
DWP CORRUPTION – YOU AND “THE LAW”
PRIVATE AGENCIES
As a DWP watchdog, we have found the DWP’s Office for Constitutional Affairs (now re-branded the Ministry of Justice) misusing taxpayer’s money to employ private legal firms to knowingly and successfully plead for corrupt and illegal decisions, from corrupt Social Security Commissioners .
USE OF GAGGING ORDERS
We have likewise found corrupt DWP management misusing taxpayer’s money, to hire private legal agencies to threaten and thereby gag private citizens attempting to pursue legitimate redress of grievance within the DWP’s internal grievance procedure long before the internal procedure is exhausted!
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
With regard to the Human Rights Act 1998, adopted by the U.K. we observe breaches of this legislation by the DWP standard, routine practice, the Appeal Tribunal Service and the OSSC invariably tolerating or paying only lip service to such, the DWP having little or no interest in their customer’s legal rights, a situation most benefit claimants know little about.
The so called “new system of protection” namely the European court, requires “domestic remedies” to have been “exhausted”. Although seemingly well intended, the Act is itself vague, slow and beyond the reach of welfare claimants to pursue, such requiring the employment of an advocate for opinion from the court of appeal and beyond, something generally not covered we understand, by legal aid, not forgetting from past cases it could take over sixteen years to get there as in the Deumeland case.
That protection the public could do without and having sought such, never finding a remedy anyway:
Klaus Deumeland was fined DM800 for bringing “vexatious” proceedings his complaint being that the proceedings were extraordinary protracted .
Make up your own mind whether sixteen years is a reasonable period to obtain (or in his case not obtain) the said protection but otherwise keep the legal profession in work at the expense of both the public purse and the victim.
More DWP Jobcentre Plus corruption on www.ukcorruptiontoday.com